Legal Opinion
United States v. Hardage
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 8, 1989No. CIV-86-1401-PPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
Before the Court is the plaintiff United States’ motion for partial summary judgment on response costs filed September 11, 1989. The United States seeks summary judgment against each of the defendants on the issue of their liability under Section 107(a)(4)(A) of CERCLA 1 , 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4)(A), for response costs incurred by the United States in conjunction with the Hardage site. The amount of response costs requested by the United States in this motion for partial summary judgment is $6,292,065.25. In addition, the United States also seeks a declaration that the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Board of Ed., Island Trees Union Free School Dist. No. 26 v. PicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. HardageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- In Re National Gypsum Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1992
- Bowen Engineering v. Estate of ReeveDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1995
- United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.