Farrigan v. Helsby
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohn T. Casey, J.
The issue presented by this article 78 proceeding is whether the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) acted in an arbitrary manner when it held that the *953Monroe-Woodbury Board of Education did not commit an unfair labor practice by refusing to negotiate with petitioner concerning an “ agency shop ” proposal.
During the course of collective negotiations with the MonroeWoodbury Board of Education, the petitioner, a teacher’s association, submitted an item entitled “ Support of Exclusive Teacher Representative ” for negotiation. According to its terms, in order to retain his employment a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sloat v. Board of Examiners of the Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Smigel v. Southgate Community School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Ritto v. FinkRochester City Court · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- Churchill v. S. A. D. 49 Teachers Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- City of Hayward v. United Public Employees Local 390, Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- New Jersey Turnpike Employees' Union, Local 194 v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- State Employees' Ass'n of New Hampshire, Inc. v. MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Cardinale v. AndersenNew York Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.