Legal Opinion

Goth v. Norman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1985No. WD 35810PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NUGENT, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants on plaintiff’s replevin action for return of cash and other personal property seized by law enforcement agencies. The court granted judgment for defendants because at the time the action was filed the cash was not in the county where suit was filed and defendants did not possess the rest of the personal property. We affirm.

The facts of this case are in part established by affidavits filed in support of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff failed to file verified denials of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kroh Bros. Development Co. v. State Line Eighty-Nine, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Nix v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Fawley v. BaileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Grubb v. Leroy L. Wade & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. State v. GothMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Auto Alarm Supply Corp. v. Lou Fusz Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Estate of HeidtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. MATTHEY v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Marston v. Rose-ElashMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Monson v. MulliganDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API