Legal Opinion

Marston v. Rose-Elash

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1986No. WD 37862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

The plaintiff was granted summary judgment in a replevin suit and the defendant appeals. The facts are relatively simple. The plaintiff, Marston, a resident of Jackson County bought a polygraph machine, located in Jackson County, from the defendant Elash for $3,000. Although paid and given a receipt, Elash, also a resident of Jackson County, never delivered the machine to Marston. Elash, after months of stalling, moved out of the state on January 1, 1984 with her husband, family and the polygraph machine. Marston filed a suit for replevin of the machine on March 14, 1984 in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Riddle v. Dean MacHinery Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Universal Credit Co. v. AntonsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Petty v. BorgUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Goth v. NormanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Jones v. DodgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ROBERTS HOLDINGS, INC. v. BECCA'S BARKERY, INC., STEVEN KALCH, and REBECCA E. KALCH, Defendants-Respondents.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Huri Enterprises, Inc. v. Spectacular Midways, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API