Legal Opinion
Bayles v. American Medical Response of Colorado, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 4, 1996No. Civil Action 94-B-2300PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action against the American Medical Response Center (AMR) alleging violations of the Fair Labor and Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., for failure to pay them for meal time, sleep time, and hours worked in excess of forty per week at a rate of one-and-a-half times regular pay. Reed Ambulance, Inc. (Reed) is the predecessor of AMR. It is undisputed here that Reed’s pay practices are imputed to AMR as Reed’s successor.
The following motions are at issue:
1) AMR’s motion to strike plaintiffs’ affidavits in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bayles v. American Medical Response of Colorado, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Henchy v. City of AbseconDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Armani v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- Felker v. Southwestern Emergency Medical Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
- Bayles v. American Medical Response of Colorado, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.