Legal Opinion

Clifton v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 23, 2015No. Case No. 3:15-cv-03985-LBPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1222ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

[Re: ECF No. 18]

LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge . .

INTRODUCTION

Carr Clifton is a photographer who licensed many of his photographs to book publisher Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company (“HMH”). These licenses were limited in scope, and Mr. Clifton alleges HMH exceeded this scope without his permission and therefore violated his copyrights in his photographs. HMH filed a motion to dismiss Mr. Clifton’s complaint because, HMH argues, the complaint does not contain sufficient factual allegations to raise a plausible claim for relief. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ticketmaster L.L.C. v. Prestige Entm't W., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
  2. Krist v. Scholastic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Becton, Dickinson and Company v. Cytek Biosciences Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Salhotra v. Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. Salhotra v. Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API