Application of Ralph E. Miegel and John J. Verbanc
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claim 3, the only claim in appellants’ application.1
Appellants’ invention is a curable composition of butadiene-styrene copolymer and bis (2,6-dimethylmorpholinothio-carbonyl) monosulfide. The monosulfide acts as a vulcanization accelerator for the butadiene-styrene copolymer elastomer and is said to afford fast and effective cures of the butadiene-styrene rubber while exhibiting an exceptional degree of processing safety.
The claim on appeal reads as follows:
3. A composition exhibiting fast…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Application of Arthur D. Lohr and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Douglas H. MoretonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Application of William F. WetterauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- In re CrounseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Oldrich K. Sebek and George B. SperoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
3Cited by3 opinions
- Application of Alan J. Lemin, Arnolds Steinhards and George SwankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Ellen L. MochelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Ralph E. Miegel and John J. VerbancCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968