Legal Opinion

Hanzlik v. Paustian

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1984No. 83-295PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

The plaintiff has appealed an order of the district court granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

This case appears here for the second time. The previous case, one involving alleged medical malpractice, appears under the same title at 211 Neb. 322, 318 N.W.2d 712 (1982), wherein the factual background is set forth. We reversed the granting of defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

By way of review we would note that in the previous case we held that whether a specific manner1 of treatment or exercise of skill by a physician demonstrates a lack of skill or knowledge, or a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanzlik v. PaustianNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Eden v. KlaasNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Kortus v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re Freeholders PetitionNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Witherspoon v. Sides Const. Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Healy v. LangdonNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Wachtel by and Through Wachtel v. BeerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Boyle v. WelshNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API