Seybert v. West Chester University
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
Defendants West Chester University and Samuel Moore, Ph.D., moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) & (6). An order was entered granting in part and denying in part the motion. Order, October 28, 1999. Jurisdiction is federal question. 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
This is an employment discrimination action arising under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and, as a supplemental claim, under the Pennsylvania Constitution. The complaint alleges that plaintiffs…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bostic v. AT & T of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2001
- O'HARA v. Indiana University of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Richardson v. Valley Asphalt, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2000
- Bradley v. West Chester University of the Pennsylvania State System Higher EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- J.B.C v. Athens Area School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.