Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Hardin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1972No. Nos. 25668, 25669PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

These are appeals by the plaintiffs from orders dismissing two actions challenging the validity of certain provisions of a milk marketing order promulgated by the defendant Secretary of Agriculture. We áffirm in both cases.

1. Nature of the cases.

The complaints are identical in the two cases except for the parties plaintiff. In No. 25,668 the plaintiff Rasmussen is a milk producer and handler who also makes and sells a milk product called “Go.” In No. 25,669, the plaintiffs Kresse, et al., are consumers of “Go,” and all but two of them are members of Concerned Consumers,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Avocados Plus Inc v. Veneman, Ann M.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  3. Community Nutrition Institute v. John R. Block, Secretary, United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. Gallo Cattle Company, a California Limited Partnership v. The United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. William J. Rasmussen v. The American Dairy Association, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API