Legal Opinion

Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Carmody

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 7, 2004No. 89,365PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, J.:

Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. (Farm Bureau) appeals the summary judgment granted to defendants Johnson and Hershewe & Gulick, P.C. (hereafter collectively referred to as “Johnson”). Farm Bureau complains that the district court incorrectly ruled that it could not sue Johnson for conversion based upon Johnson’s settling of his client’s personal injury action against the tortfeasor and distributing the settlement proceeds without paying Farm Bureau’s claimed lien for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. Finding an action for conversion will not he under the facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. State Bank of BurdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  2. Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. Temmen v. Kent-Brown Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. In the Interest of M.R.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. NeetCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Near v. CrivelloDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2009
  2. Howard's Optical Dispensary, Inc. v. United States Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API