Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fourth National Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1937No. 27236PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

On the 18th day of August, 1933, the plaintiff, the Fourth National Bank of Tulsa, commenced an action against the defendants, John T. Smith and M. F. Powers, to foreclose a note and mortgage on real estate. Proceedings were instituted by the defendants under the State Moratorium Law, and in order to defeat the delay incident to such proceedings plaintiff filed an action in the district court of Chautauqua county, Kan., to foreclose the same note and mortgage, which also included Kansas land, and proceeded to a judgment and sale of the Kansas land for the sum of $1,500. The answer and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Oklahoma City Land & Development Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Brooks v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Attaway v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka Ry. Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Smith v. Fourth Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Smith v. Fourth Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  4. Daniels v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Daniels v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API