Daniels v. Scott
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Dissent
WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice
(dissenting) .
I respectfully dissent to the majority opinion inter alia for the reason that I believe the orders appealed from are not ap-pealable orders.
The plaintiff’s cause of action is based on the alleged negligence of the defendant Scott, Sr., and his agent. Plaintiff attempted to join in this action as a party defendant, the insurance carrier of the primary defendant Scott, Sr. Defendant Hercules Casualty and Insurance Company filed a motion to strike all parts of such petition referring to insurance requirements of the L.P.G.Act (52 O.S.1951, Supp.1955, §…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- Enders v. LongmireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Oklahoma City Land & Development Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- De Hasque v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.