Legal Opinion · Dissent

Daniels v. Scott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 9, 1959No. 37946Published

1Dissent

WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice

(dissenting) .

I respectfully dissent to the majority opinion inter alia for the reason that I believe the orders appealed from are not ap-pealable orders.

The plaintiff’s cause of action is based on the alleged negligence of the defendant Scott, Sr., and his agent. Plaintiff attempted to join in this action as a party defendant, the insurance carrier of the primary defendant Scott, Sr. Defendant Hercules Casualty and Insurance Company filed a motion to strike all parts of such petition referring to insurance requirements of the L.P.G.Act (52 O.S.1951, Supp.1955, §…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  3. Enders v. LongmireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Oklahoma City Land & Development Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. De Hasque v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API