Legal Opinion

Matoil Service & Transport Co. v. Schneider

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 26, 1942No. 7923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, as the owner of a tank barge, sued the defendant in the District Court for the District of New Jersey to recover the reasonable value of the use made by the defendant of the barge for storage purposes while it was in the defendant’s hands as United States Marshal under a writ of seizure issued out of the District Court for New Jersey. The case was tried to the court below without a jury upon stipulated facts. The trial court dismissed the complaint and entered judgment for the. defendant for costs, from which the plaintiff appeals.

The controversy arose out…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bailis v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Quintana-AguayoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. Tebbs v. Baker-Whiteley Towing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
  3. Hester O'Neill Wilson v. Charles O. Bittinger, National Metropolitan Bank of Washington, and Thedistrict of Columbia, AppellesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Beck v. International Harvester Credit Corp. (In re Hayes)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
  5. Schenley Distillers Corp. v. Kinsey Distilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API