Legal Opinion
United States v. Quintana-Aguayo
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 29, 2000No. 99-1378, 99-2017PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
In this consolidated appeal, claimants seek interlocutory review of decisions of the district court resulting in the seizure of property during the pendency of a civil forfeiture action. 1 We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
In 1998, the government initiated a civil action in rent by filing a complaint for, forfeiture of property owned by convicted drug-dealer Luis Quintana-Aguayo. The property includes the real property and other assets of Hacienda Sabanera-Ciudad Caballistica, Inc., a horse ranch. 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) and (7) and 18 U.S.C. § 981. The ranch was brought within the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gill v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. VolungusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Lee-Barnes v. Puerto Ven Quarry Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Arch InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Lieberman v. Polytop Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.