Crittenden v. Sands
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Harlan county. Tried below before Gaslin, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an action to recover a judgment for the sum of $650 against Kent, who is alleged to be a fraudulent grantee of certain goods belonging to one Sands, by reason of which the plaintiffs were defrauded. A demurrer to the petition was sustained in the court below and the action dismissed. It is alleged in the petition in substance that, on the 18th day of January, 1884, the defendant, Sands, and his co-partner, Hullquist, were doing business at Orleans in this state; that during the year 1883 the plaintiffs sold to said firm divers goods, wares, and merchandise, for which said firm, on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murtha v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Ferguson v. HillmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Seymour v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Fullerton v. ViallNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blair v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- McElhanon v. HingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Phinney v. State ex rel. StrattonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Bigby v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Doherty v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.