Seymour v. . Wilson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
That the creditors of an insolvent debtor have an equitable interest in his property, or the means he has of satisfying their demands, which the law, under certain circumstances, will recognize and enforce, is proven by the fact that every gift or gratuitous transfer of such property, although valid as against the debtor himself, is void by the common law as to his creditors. Where, however, a valuable consideration is paid for the transfer, the interest of the creditor is superseded. The purchaser, in such a case, having parted with value upon the faith of the vendor's possession and…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Robinson v. Springfield Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1885
- Murphy v. . BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Farlin v. SookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- First National Bank v. Pomona Tile Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Commercial Bank v. . SherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.