Legal Opinion
United States v. Sindel
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1995No. Nos. 94-2683, 94-2684PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Attorney Richard Sindel of Sindel & Sin-del, P.C., appeals a district court order requiring him to disclose information about two clients, intervenors John Doe and Jane Doe, on Internal Revenue Service Form 8300. These forms, which are used to report cash transactions in excess of $10,000 pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 60501, request the name, address, tax identification number, and other information about each payor and each person on whose behalf payment is made. Sin-del argues that completion of the forms would violate his own ethical duties and the First,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Nancy Gertner, Etc., John Doe, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- McFadyen v. Duke UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- State ex rel. Koster v. CainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.