Legal Opinion
Ebell v. Seapac Fisheries, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1984No. S-134PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
The question presented in this petition for review is whether the superior court acted properly in denying defendants’ motion for a change of venue from the Second Judicial District to the Third Judicial District.
The statutory section that governs venue in cases not involving real property is AS 22.10.030(b), which provides: “If ... a defendant can be personally served within a judicial district of the state, the action against that defendant shall be commenced in that judicial district or in the judicial district in which the claim arose.”
William Hilborn, a Canadian…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lamont v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tucker v. FiansonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Rolinski v. LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- McGuire v. FitzsimmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- O'CALLAGHAN v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Brooks Range Petroleum Corporation v. ShearerAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.