Beijing Automotive Industry Import & Export Corp. v. Indian Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Beijing Automotive Industry Import and Export Corporation (“BAIEC”) initiated this lawsuit against Defendant Indian Industries, Inc. d/b/a Escalade Sports {‘‘Escalade") after a ten-year business relationship between the two entities deteriorated. Presently pending before the Court is BAIEC’s Motion for Summary Judgment. [Filing No. 68.] '
I
Standard op Review
A motion for summary judgment asks the Court to find that a trial is unnecessary because there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and, instead, the movant is entitled to judgment…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Daryl L. Johnson v. Cambridge Industries, Incorporated and Meridian Automotive Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Nelson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- O'LEARY v. Accretive Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BRC Rubber & Plastics, Incorpo v. Continental Carbon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- BRC Rubber & Plastics Inc v. Continental Carbon CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
- BRC Rubber & Plastics, Incorpo v. Continental Carbon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- BRC Rubber & Plastics, Incorpo v. Continental Carbon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018