Legal Opinion

Beijing Automotive Industry Import & Export Corp. v. Indian Industries, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided May 12, 2015No. 1:13-cv-01850-JMS-DMLPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Beijing Automotive Industry Import and Export Corporation (“BAIEC”) initiated this lawsuit against Defendant Indian Industries, Inc. d/b/a Escalade Sports {‘‘Escalade") after a ten-year business relationship between the two entities deteriorated. Presently pending before the Court is BAIEC’s Motion for Summary Judgment. [Filing No. 68.] '

I

Standard op Review

A motion for summary judgment asks the Court to find that a trial is unnecessary because there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and, instead, the movant is entitled to judgment…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Daryl L. Johnson v. Cambridge Industries, Incorporated and Meridian Automotive Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Nelson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. O'LEARY v. Accretive Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. BRC Rubber & Plastics, Incorpo v. Continental Carbon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. BRC Rubber & Plastics Inc v. Continental Carbon CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
  3. BRC Rubber & Plastics, Incorpo v. Continental Carbon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. BRC Rubber & Plastics, Incorpo v. Continental Carbon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API