Legal Opinion

Sargent v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1924No. 18140PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

The entire issue in this case is made by the allegations of the petition and the demurrer thereto, and presents two questions for determination:

First. Is injunction the proper remedy to prevent further proceedings in the assessment of compensation, or should that assessment proceeding in the court of common pleas proceed to final judgment, thereby remitting the property owner to an error proceeding for her remedy?

Second. Inasmuch as the city of Cincinnati has full possession of said premises and the right to make the same use thereof as the city could make if it owned the fee-simple title…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Cincinnati v. VesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. City of Cincinnati v. VesterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  3. Emery v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Reel v. City of FreeportAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. State, Ex Rel. Williams v. Belpre City School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API