Carney v. City of Springfield
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.
The plaintiff, Michael P. Carney, appeals from a Superior Court judgment entered following allowance of a motion for summary judgment filed by the city of Springfield. The test whether a motion for summary judgment should be allowed is twofold: (1) whether after consideration of the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and affidavits, a genuine issue of material fact exists; and (2) whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Mass. R. Civ. P. 56 (c), 365 Mass. 824 (1974). The Superior Court judge, in this action in the nature of certiorari, as provided…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Attorney General v. ColletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- FIC Homes of Blackstone, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Auditor of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- State Board of Retirement v. BulgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- St. Botolph Citizens Committee, Inc. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Chardin v. Police CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.