St. Botolph Citizens Committee, Inc. v. Boston Redevelopment Authority
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
We transferred these consolidated appeals to this court on our own motion to decide whether the plaintiffs can maintain their challenges to a decision made by the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) concerning the development of new residential units in the Fenway Urban Renewal Area. The plaintiffs sought to set aside the BRA’s decision in a six-count complaint seeking review in the nature of certiorari and *3declaratory judgments. The defendants filed motions to dismiss. A judge in the Superior Court reported, without decision, the question whether the plaintiffs had the right to obtain…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Selectmen of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Carney v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Damaskos v. Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Enos v. Secretary of Environmental AffairsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Boston Medical Center Corp. v. Secretary of the Executive Office of Health & Human ServicesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- School Committee v. Board of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Planning Board of BourneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Adoption of JohnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.