Legal Opinion

Peña Martínez v. Azar

United States District Court

Decided April 15, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-01206-WGYPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

2. Relevant Federal Policies Towards Puerto Rico

The complaint alleges that Government used tax policy to encourage private companies to invest in Puerto Rico prior to 1996. Compl. ¶ 4. The complaint alleges that ending this policy contributed to Puerto Rico slipping into a recession, which is now going on 13 years. Id. Puerto Rico's economic collapse culminated in its government and public utility companies becoming unable to pay their bills by 2016 and deepened when Hurricane Maria struck the island in 2017. Id. ¶¶ 2, 7. Further, the complaint cites estimates that "between 52.3 to 59.8%" of…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Vaello-MaderoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  2. López v. UnióN De Trabajadores De La Industria Eléctrica Y RiegoUnited States District Court · 2019
  3. IRR Gas Station Corp. v. Puma Energy Caribe LLCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020
  4. Pena-Martinez v. US Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API