Legal Opinion

Borofsky's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 10, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The narrow issue raised in this appeal is whether the value of employer-paid health insurance benefits constitutes earnings of the employee for the purpose of computing his average weekly wage under G. L. c. 152 (1990 ed.), the workers’ compensation law. For the reasons that follow, we hold that such value shall not be included.

The reviewing board of the Department of Industrial Accidents denied the claim of Richard Borofsky (employee) to include the value of his employer-paid health insurance benefits in the calculation of his average weekly wage. He ap pealed to the Appeals Court. G. L. c.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Powers's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Perkins's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. State Compensation Insurance Authority v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Palomba's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCarty's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Louis's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Bradley's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Lazarus v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Mike's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API