Legal Opinion

Hagerott v. Morton County Board of Commissioners

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2010No. 20090180PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Donald and Mark Hagerott appeal from a district court order affirming a decision by the Morton County Board of Commissioners to issue Fred Berger a conditional use permit to operate a feedlot on Berger’s property in Morton County. The Hagerotts argue they have standing to challenge the conditional use permit, the Morton County Commission’s interpretation of a Morton County Animal Feeding Operation ordinance and issuance of the conditional use permit are arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable, and the Commission’s issuance of the conditional use permit constitutes a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. City of Fargo, Cass Cty. v. Harwood TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Nodak Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward County Farm BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Pulkrabek v. Morton CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gowan v. Ward County CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. KinsellaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. BuckleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Berger v. SellersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Schmidt v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Dahm v. Stark County Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API