Legal Opinion
Cahoo v. Sas Inst. Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 2, 2018No. Case Number 17–10657PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge
In 2012, the State of Michigan's Unemployment Insurance Agency (UIA) implemented a new automated system to detect and punish individuals who submitted fraudulent unemployment insurance claims. By most accounts, the system did not work well, as it lacked human oversight, it detected fraud by certain claimants where none existed, it provided little or no notice to the accused claimants, it failed in many instances to allow administrative appeals, and it assessed penalties and forfeitures against individuals who were blameless. The plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited114 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cahoo v. SAS Inst. Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- BEAMAN v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- Cahoo v. SAS Analytics Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Cahoo v. SAS Analytics Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Cahoo v. SAS Analytics Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.