State v. . Danenberg
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted in the recorder's court of the city of Charlotte of a misdemeanor for selling near beer without a license, and appealed to the Superior Court of Mecklenburg. He was convicted by the jury, and from the judgment of the court appealed to the Supreme Court.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. Defendant was charged with engaging in the business of selling near beer without paying the license tax imposed thereon by the city of Charlotte. The ordinance in question taxes every person engaged in the sale of near beer $1,000. The defendant admitted that he was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Capital City Dairy Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Turner v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Gatlin v. Town of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Winston v. Beeson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ScogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Snyder v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Tea Co. v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Brown v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- In re LockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.