Legal Opinion · Dissent

Snyder v. . Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1940PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1DissentStacy, C. J.

WINBORNE, J., joins in dissenting opinion. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant Commissioner of Revenue to recover the sum of $30.00 paid under protest as a tax on the privilege of operating a vending machine selling soft drinks upon a deposit of five cents, under section 130, chapter 158, of the Public Laws of 1939. He complains that the tax "constitutes an illegal classification, lacks uniformity and is arbitrary, unreasonable, discriminatory and unjust and is illegal and invalid." Plaintiff further contends that in this section of the Revenue Act the General Assembly has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. American Sugar Refining Co. v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Brown-Forman Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Henderson v. . Gill, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Broadwell Realty Corp. v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Nesbitt v. . Gill, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API