In re Member of the State Bar
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZLAKET, Chief Justice.
¶ 1 This is a lawyer disciplinary proceeding. A hearing committee unanimously concluded that the respondent, Alicia F. Tocco, did not do “anything that violates the letter or spirit of the Ethical Rules” and recommended that all charges against her be dismissed. The Disciplinary Commission, with two members dissenting, reached a contrary conclusion and now urges that the respondent be censured and placed on two years probation.1 We review this matter pursuant to Arizona Supreme Court Rule 53(e).
I. BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Alicia Tocco began practicing law in Arizona in 1979…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re ToccoArizona Supreme Court · 1999