Legal Opinion
Strick Corp. v. Strickland
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 27, 2001No. Civ.A. 00-3343PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KAUFFMAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Strick Corporation’s (“Plaintiff’) and Defendant James B. Strickland’s (“Defendant”) cross-motions for summary judgment and all responses thereto. For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiffs cross-motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant is an independent computer consultant and software developer. In July 1995, he decided that it would be advantageous for his business to have an easy to remember Internet domain name. 1 He learned that it was too…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- A&h Sportswear, Inc Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Fisons Horticulture, Inc., in No. 93-7224 v. Vigoro Industries, Inc., in No. 93-7287Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Avery Dennison Corp. v. SumptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. Greatdomains. Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- World Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc. v. Big Dog Holdings, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Tillery v. Leonard & Sciolla, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Warren Publishing Co. v. SpurlockDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Ford Motor Co. v. 2600 EnterprisesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.