Legal Opinion
World Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc. v. Big Dog Holdings, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 10, 2003No. 1:01-cv-00394PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court
CERCONE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
The Worldwide Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc. (“WWE”) filed a seventeen (17) count Amended Complaint asserting claims against Big Dog Holdings, Inc. (“Big Dog”) for copyright infringement (Counts I through VI), trademark infringement under Section 32 of the Lan-ham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114, (Count VII), trademark infringement and false designation of origin under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), (Count VIII), trade dress infringement under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), (Count IX),…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perini Corporation v. Perini Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Utah Lighthouse Ministry v. Foundation for Apologetic Information & ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- University of Kansas v. SinksDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- AFL PHILADELPHIA LLC v. KrauseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Lewis v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Hart v. Electronic Arts, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.