Shubinsky v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtKuNzig, Judge
We adopt plaintiff’s view that the unusual circumstances which surrounded his RIF obviated his responsibility to pursue a timely administrative appeal prior to seeking judicial relief.
Plaintiff is a 10-point preference eligible under the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944 (VPA), 5 U.S.C. §3309, having lost an arm in service during World War II. He was employed in a civilian capacity by the Department of the Navy at Brooklyn Naval Shipyard from 1942 to 1963, with two interruptions for military duty and to attend college. In 1963, he was transferred to the Naval Applied Science Laboratory (NASL),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Albert Piccone v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Martilla v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Piccone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Manzi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- McDougall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Elias Covington v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- 55 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1675, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,952 Julio M. Cruz v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Bendure v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Bohn v. County of DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Wilder v. ProkopCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.