Stitt v. Smith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Itasca county to determine adverse claims to certain timber lands. From an order granting plaintiffs’ motions to strike out the answer as false, frivolous and sham, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
In 1901 plaintiffs commenced an action _ against the Rat Portage Lumber Company and P. A. Smith, the husband of appellant, to have certain deeds declared to be mortgages and for permission to redeem. The decision of this court on that appeal will be found in Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co., 96 Minn. 27, 104 N. W. 561. Thereafter, in 1905, judgment was duly entered in the district court. In pursuance of the judgment plaintiffs in that action applied to the trial court to be allowed 'to pay the redemption money, $66,752.41, and in accordance with the order of the court the money was paid to Mr.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Randall v. KreigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Morrison v. RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. LundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Barnum Grain Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Deli v. HasselmoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Edwards v. Plains Light & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. HessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. BoneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Veranth v. MoravitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.