Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Lund
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from a judgmént ^f • the district court for Nicollet county, Powers, J.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, J.2
Action to quiet title to real estate, in which plaintiff had judgment on the pleadings, and defendants appealed.
From the complaint it appears that on December 17, 1894, one Plummer was the owner of the east half of the northeast quarter of section 2, township 111, range 30, in Nicollet county, and entered into a written contract with one John Rund by which he sold and agreed to convey the *46premises to Lund for the price and upon the terms specified in the writing. The contract was not recorded until long after the execution and delivery of the deeds hereinafter mentioned. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. BickfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Madson v. MadsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Dayton v. CorserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Haaven v. HoaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- New v. WheatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schaeffer v. NewberrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Cocker v. CockerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Stitt v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Griswold v. McGeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Nellas v. CarlineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.