Legal Opinion
Nashville Livestock Commission v. Cox
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 16, 1990No. 89-178Published
1Opinion of the Court
787 S.W.2d 664 (1990)
302 Ark. 69
NASHVILLE LIVESTOCK COMMISSION and U.S. Insurance Group, Petitioners,
v.
John Paul COX, Respondent.
No. 89-178.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
April 16, 1990.
William G. Wright, Arkadelphia, for respondent.
Barber, McCaskill, Amsler, Jones & Hale, Little Rock, for petitioners.
NEWBERN, Justice.
The Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission refused compensation to the respondent, John Paul Cox. Due to unusual circumstances, Cox was required by his employer, Nashville Livestock Commission (NLC), to work extra hours over a three-day period. He suffered chest pain and was…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Glaze; Concurrence · Glaze; Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- W. S. Kirkpatrick & Co. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
- Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
- McGregor & Pickett v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Frank D. Crum v. General Adjustment Bureau and Home Indemnity Company, General Adjustment Bureau and Home Indemnity Company v. Frank D. CrumCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.