Legal Opinion
Russell v. Starr
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1952No. 5450PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Justice.
The suit is on account. Appellee alleges that appellants are indebted to him for unpaid insurance ¡premiums on policies issued by National Surety Corporation of’ New York.
Appellants urge various defenses, among which it is claimed that the policies had been canceled by appellee and that premiums had been paid to date of cancellation. The conclusion we reach on this question disposes of other issues.
On July 11, 1949, appellants then being in arrears in the payment of premiums, received a notice from appellee which reads: “We have made several attempts to locate you during the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gendron v. Calvert Fire Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Frontier-Pontiac, Inc. v. Dubuque Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Roon v. Van SchouwenIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
- American Glove Co. v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Staley v. Municipal Mutual Insurance Co. of W. Va.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Hart v. MFA InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Securities Acceptance Corp. v. ValenciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,397 Dennis G. Bezanson, Trustee for Medomak Canning Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan Insurance and Annuity Company, Dennis G. Bezanson, Trustee for Medomak Canning Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Bezanson ex rel. Medomak Canning Co. v. Metropolitan Insurance & Annuity Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.