Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Seibert

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1893No. 757Published

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion

On Petition fob a Reheabing.

Gavin, J.

The appellees seek a rehearing upon the ground that this court had no jurisdiction, by reason of a failure of the appellant to bring before it all the parties plaintiff in the court below. The judgment was in favor of George W. Seibert, Leander A. Fulmer and Frederic Gansberg. In preparing the assignment of errors, counsel for appellant, by misprision and accident, wrote the name of the second appellee as "Hiram Seibert” instead of Leander A. Fulmer, as it should have been.

The authorities establish the proposition as claimed by appellees’ learned counsel,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hutts v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hunderlock v. Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Bank of Westfield v. InmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Snyder v. State ex rel. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Braden v. LeibenguthIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API