Legal Opinion

Willmann v. City of San Antonio

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided November 3, 2003No. 04-02-00853-CVPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.

Robert Willmann, Jr., Brigid Sheridan, and Ed Minarich (collectively “appellants”), challenge the method used by the City of San Antonio (“the City”) in appointing municipal court judges. Appellants contend on appeal that the trial court erred in granting the City’s no-evidence motion for partial summary judgment. Appellants also challenge the trial court’s judgment that Ordinance No. 86503 does not violate Article 16, section 17 of the Texas Constitution. We agree with the trial court that the ordinance does not violate the Texas Constitution;…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Commissioners Court of Titus County v. AganTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Moore v. K Mart Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Foreman v. WhittyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Fiske v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  3. Standley v. SansomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Walp v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  5. City of Laredo v. Escamilla, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API