Legal Opinion
Maust v. Palmer
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 12, 1994No. 93APE10-1483PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Whiteside, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Allan B. Maust, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment to defendantappellee, Robert G. Palmer. Plaintiff presents the following three assignments of error:
“1. The trial court committed reversible error in failing to grant an extension of time in which to acquire expert testimony to refute defendant’s motion.
“2. The trial court committed reversible error by failing to rule in the plaintiffs motion to exclude the affidavit of Louis A. Jacobs.
“3. The trial court committed reversible error by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Maust v. Bank One Columbus, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- American Motors Corp. v. HuffstutlerOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Solon v. Solon Baptist Temple, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Nyamusevya v. HawkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Rigby v. Fallsway Equipment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Carbis Walker, LLP v. Hill, Barth and King, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Lightbody v. RustOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Columbus v. AMC Vision, V, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.