People v. Madeyski
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
Defendant Maciej Andrzej Madeyski purports to appeal from an order forfeiting certain items of computer-related equipment. He contends Ms federal constitutional rigMs were abridged by the demal of his right to have appointed counsel, the denial of his right to a jury trial, and by failing to have the facts justifying forfeiture proved beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm the judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
The factual basis for defendant’s offenses is undisputed. Defendant was formerly employed as a network admmistrator at Intellisys. His duties included the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- People v. CastellanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Allabach v. Santa Clara County Fair Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. Santa Rosa Police DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. $17,522.08 UNITED STATES CURRENCYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- State v. $1,010.00 IN AMERICAN CURRENCYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006