Legal Opinion

McDonald v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 2, 1988No. 28, 29, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

The two cases before us present one common question: does a circuit court’s authority to review, de novo, a District Court’s revocation of probation extend to a de novo determination of disposition? We answer the question in the affirmative. 1

On 10 February 1987, a judge sitting in the District Court in Baltimore County found petitioner, Kathleen McDonald, guilty of solicitation. McDonald received a six month suspended sentence and was placed on supervised probation for one year. On 27 July 1987, the District Court found that McDonald had violated the terms of her probation, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chase v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Dean v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Hardy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Greco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Hoile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Webster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Wink v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Telak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API