Legal Opinion

Affleck v. Potomac Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 16, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarrows, J.

Plaintiff sought to recover upon a fire insurance policy issued to her by defendant and alleged to cover a “Willys-Six” automobile which was destroyed by fire. The policy is an “automobile policy approved by the National Convention of Insurance Commissioners.” The vital question was whether it covered plaintiff’s car.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit on the ground that there was a misstatement of the subject matter of the in surance as to the “kind and model of car, the year when it was bought, the price that was paid for it” and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lumber Underwriters of NY v. RifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Wierengo v. American Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Haley v. Sharon Township Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Smith v. American Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evora v. HenrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  2. Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio v. CONREAL LLCDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2010
  3. Affleck v. KeanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API