Legal Opinion
Sandoval v. Ali
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 28, 2014No. C-13-03230(EDL)PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Chief Magistrate Judge
Plaintiffs Rafael Sandoval and Luis Ca-lixto allege, on behalf of themselves and a putative class, that Defendants failed to comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216, California labor law, and California unfair competition law. Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint with prejudice, to strike Plaintiffs’ class allegations, and to disqualify" Plaintiffs’ counsel. The Court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Harris v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Corcoran v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Stewart v. Screen Gems-Emi Music, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Tatung Co. v. Shu Tze HsuDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Nicks v. Koch Meat Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.