Legal Opinion

Azarmanesh v. Garland

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 31, 2025No. 3:23-cv-05210Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 OKHTAY AZARMANESH, Case No. 23-cv-05210-LJC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS FOR 9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 PAMELA BONDI, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 35 Defendants. 11 12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 Plaintiff Okhtay Azarmanesh, a lawful permanent resident (LPR), brings claims related to 14 the denial of his naturalization application to become a U.S. citizen. Defendants are several U.S. 15 government officials with responsibilities related to immigration and naturalization, some of 16 whom are automatically substituted under…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API