Legal Opinion
Jewison v. Dieudonne
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 16, 1914No. 18,703-(222). [fn2]PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 149 N. W. 20.
2 April, 1914, term calendar. Action against defendants Dieudonne as partners and defendant Nyquist as their alleged employee, to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been caused by the latter's negligence while plaintiff was in a shop conducted under the firm name of E. Dieudonne Son. A verdict was returned against all defendants, and each of them appealed from an order denying their applications for judgment notwithstanding or for a new trial.
The accident occurred in the village of Janesville, in the afternoon of September 5, 1912. It is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. Lowell, Lawrence, & Haverhill Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Richmond & Manchester Railway Co. v. Moore's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Mastad v. BrethrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Corrigan v. ElsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Fryklund v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Eklund v. KapetasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Frye v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Malolepszy v. Central Market, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Schlick v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Hunter v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.