Legal Opinion

In re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1999No. 13-99-610-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice SEERDEN.

By the present mandamus proceeding, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company complains that the trial court abused its discretion when it vacated its prior order transferring venue to another county. Relator contends that the trial court lost jurisdiction over the case before it attempted to vacate the prior transfer. We deny the requested mandamus relief.

Plaintiff Dorothy Saleh brought the underlying lawsuit in Refugio County against numerous defendants, including Southwestern Bell and Builders Transport, for the wrongful death of her son. Builders Transport…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re De La Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  3. Alicia P. Levitas, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Sarah Pasol Factor v. Pedro L. Barraza, Maria Elena Barraza, and Barraza Family Limited Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  4. State v. Miesha Valrae Robinson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2016
  5. in Re: Robert E. De La Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API