Legal Opinion
Camacho v. Major League Baseball
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 19, 2013No. 12-cv-2859-L(BGS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 12]
M. JAMES LORENZ, District Judge.
On November 30, 2012, Plaintiffs David Gonzalez Camacho and Daniel Arrellano Pesqueira commenced this tort action against multiple defendants.1 This action arises from allegations that Major League Baseball conspired with the Mexican Major Leagues to prevent baseball prospect Daniel Pesqueira from playing baseball in the United States. Pending before the Court is the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball (d/b/a Major League Baseball), Major League Baseball Enterprises, Inc., and Major League Baseball…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Makah Indian Tribe v. C. William VerityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peabody Western Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Harold Dawavendewa, a Single Man v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, an Arizona Corporation, the Navajo NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Delgado v. Plaza Las Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Jamul Action Committee v. ChaudhuriDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- (PS) Halajian v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PS) Halajian v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- National Loan Acquisitions Co. v. NiswongerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.