Legal Opinion

Anti-Mite Engineering Co. v. Peerman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1943No. 17,054PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Draper, J. —

Appellee, Edward H. Peerman, an employee of the appellant, the Anti-Mite Engineering Company, was injured in an automobile collision with a car driven by a State policeman at the intersection of Pleasant Run Boulevard and Sherman Drive, in the City of Indianapolis, Indiana.

The evidence discloses that Sherman Drive runs north and south, and that Pleasant Run Boulevard, a preferential street, runs in an easterly and westerly direction, but at the intersection here involved at an angle to the southeast and northwest. Appellee Peer-man was traveling north on Sherman Drive in a light…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tabor v. Continental Baking CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wood v. SnyderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Goshen Veneer Co. v. CozziIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Phillips v. Jackson, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gamble v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Lincoln Operating Co. v. GillisIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. New York Central R. Co. v. CAVINDER, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Kempf v. HimselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. DeMichaeli & Associates v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API