Legal Opinion

Lord Electric Co. v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1978No. A7606-07849, SC 25243PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiff (Lord) filed this action against defendant (P.I.E.) to recover damages to property incurred during transit and attorney fees pursuant to ORS 20.080(1). The case was tried before the court on stipulated facts. The trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of damages as stipulated, together with attorney fees. Defendant appeals.

Defendant’s sole assignment of error is:

"The court erred in failing to determine as a matter of law that the plaintiff failed to commence its action within 2 years and one day from the date of refusal to pay claim pursuant to the terms of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Louisiana & Western Railroad v. GardinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Leigh Ellis & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Farley v. UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Tiano v. ElsensohnOregon Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schulstad v. HUDSON OIL CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. L & M Investment Co. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1986
  4. Meadowbrook v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Rio Grande Motor Way, Inc. v. Resort Graphics, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API